• Please support our Les Paul Forum Sponsors with your business - Gary's Classic Guitars, Wildwood Guitars, Chicago Music Exchange, Reverb.com, Throbak.com and True Vintage Guitar. From personal experience doing business with all of them, they are first class organizations. Please let them know that you are a member of the Les Paul Forum. Thank you!
  • WE NEED FUNDS TO KEEP THE LPF GOING! SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and moved to a new hosting platform. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

Small Amp Rant

Offshore Angler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
922
Tony Iommi was way more blues, minor pentatonic. He was heavily inspired by Django Reinhardt and used the tritone interval in his music, but I don't know anyone who would consider Django's jazz music boring. Randy Rhodes was heavily classical. I watched a video a while back where a classical composer was subjected to his music for the first time and he was literally blown away. I myself surely don't find Randy boring. I wouldn't consider Metallica to follow the Hungarian minor at all. Mostly Aeolian with some minor pentatonic and blues. They throw in some dissonance as well, but it is most definitely not gypsy music.

Just out of curiosity, what scales/modes do you find particularly appealing with disco and funk?

That's a great question but really hard to answer. Why? Well, modal playing on guitar is really about patterns and shifting them, and some scales don't fall into modes. All modes only use seven notes but there are 12 notes to work with so modes can result in some really boring, repetitive and forgettable music.

It's also not usually how a trained pro approaches the task at hand.

First, do they have charts and are they expecting you to play "to the ink"? If that's the case knowing scales and modes is great and all that, but reading and dexterity is required over theory.

Or on the other hand are they providing you with some framework for a song and wanting you to flesh it out? If it's original that's the money shot because you can sometimes get writing credit and that's were the real money is for a musician.

So for funk - funk has in general no guitar hero solos. Rarely am I playing more than a triad. Funk is about one thing: impeccable timing within highly syncopated beats. Yes, since flat sevens are ubiquitous in funk you may want to think modally as mixolydian (as often heard in TOP for example), or scale-wise maybe the blues scale, but mostly one stays in the chord tones so you really don't need to think in terms of scales. The other thing with funk is that there usually aren't a lot of changes going on (Buddy Miles excluded!) and your job as the guitar player is to propel things forward. Since the funk songs commonly don't feature cadences for resolution it's more about the syncopation and rhythm, again using triads or dyads to propel, but always finding the correct timing to keep forward motion in the groove. Funk grooves are amongst the tightest you ever be asked to play and even the tiniest timing error that wouldn't be noticed in other music will stick out like a sore thumb in funk. In short, funk is no place for undisciplined players who don't practice without a metronome or click.

Look at it this way: Jimmie Hendrix was a pretty innovative soloist (!) but nobody ever remembers a solo he did when he was in James Brown's band.

Disco. Wow, what to say here. For all it's malignment amongst a certain bunch of leather-clad hipsters, it can be some of the most sophisticated and demanding music you'll approach. Common minor to major transitions, use of sub-dominate substitutions to a B section, II,V,I's sneaking in here and there. You gotta be on your toes. And - with all this going on - it's melodic. Earth, Wind and Fire, AWB, Chicago, Bee Gees, Stevie Wonder all just major, major songwriting. But also a bit easier since they 're iconic songs as the guitar player I'm expected to reproduce the hit live. So again, I'm not having to put a lot of thought into choosing notes - Just remembering them :).
Where Disco will separate the wheat from the chaff with players is when they ask you to ride it on a stretch.

How do I approach my note selection for improvising? Rarely, if ever, do I start thinking in terms of a scale or mode. That would be akin to someone asking me build an engine and me starting by selecting what single wrench I'm going to use. Not very practical. I'm going to start with displacement, compression ratio, boost, head and valves, wet or dry sump, etc. Once all that's sketched out then I decide what tools to use.

Approaching a solo is much the same. First what key is it in? What chords are used, and what cadences are employed to build tension and resolve? These are the keys to improvising. Then it's the overall rhythmic feel and importantly, the dynamics. I'm going to work in the chord tones first because they're the roadmaps. Larry Carlton is a MASTER of this and I've tried to lean into his playing often. Using the chord tones I next want to build interest so I start looking to inversions. Even simple first inversion can add spice in a melody.

Now, am I only using the chord tones? Of course not. The other notes come into one of two categories (melodically speaking here- we all use ghosts and mutes for syncopation), either I choose it for a melodic tone or passing tone. Think about it, I have the I, III,V, & VII already mapped out in the chord tones. What's missing? The two, the four and the sixth. Easy peasy. With good ear training you hear the note you want and identify the interval as either a half or full tone and play accordingly. If you miss, just make a chromatic move IN TIME WITH THE MUSIC. Nobody will notice except your professor.

Now, if I'm still in the solo and it's starting to sound a bit tired I start looking for substitutions. For example you can almost always substitute a ii for IV to add spice. Hey, F and Dm are pretty darned close, aren't they?! But the audience wasn't expecting that and it's still results in a pleasantly resolving cadence. This can be effective in funk because you often create motifs (repeating patterns) and when one starts to get stale a sub may be perfect. In disco, being so melodic, not so much.

If you want to add a jazz feel play around with the 6th ala Robben Ford.

But notice here, I'm never once addressing scale or mode. And, its musical, not technical.

Playing scales sounds like - scales. Forcing modes can result in really bad note choices and boring linear lines that don't pull in the listener.

Do I ever get lost? Of course, all the time but that's when I'll go modal until I find my way, and when I do, I almost always will use the same Ionian scale patterns to find my way. I just shift the pattern to the closest place on the neck I need to be to have that set of intervals line up with the mode I want. Example, I'm over a Cm and I feel a brain fart coming on, I simply switch to an Eb Ionian scale until I feel a new direction.

It might sound complicated but trust me, after you do this stuff enough you'll see it all laid out on the fretboard as clear as day and wonder what all the fuss was about. You can do it, you just need to get the theory under your belt to see it.

So back to disco and why it can be really, really challenging for a player. First off, it's a pretty widely defined genre. From Donna Summers, to The Rolling Stones, to Kool and the Gang. Kool and the Gang is a great example because they really are a blend of funk and disco, so you may end up with all the challenges of a one-chord vamp with a melody all over a funk groove. Think about that. Not for the faint of heart. Or Tower of Power, or Buddy Miles, or Rufus. You have got to be dead-effing-balls on the funk all while improvising. But when it's happening, it will make the hair on the back of your neck stand up. Instead of a bunch of drunkards in Tee shirts and ripped jeans making devil horns and screaming, you get everyone from toddlers to great-grandmothers up and grooving. They can't help themselves.

And remember always with funk or disco - timing is everything. Lot's a stabs on say the second sixteenth of the fourth beat kind of stuff. You can't be sleeping or just "feelin' it".

Metal, meh, I'm too old to be angry and rebellious all the time. And it doesn't pay.

So where I rarely stick to a modal/scales approach, if you want to start down this road I would say start by leaning a couple different Ionian scale patterns key of C. Next play the C Ionian scale over an Am chord and listen to what just happened and then figure out what mode of the Key of A that is. Next, play the C Ionian scale over a G7 chord and figure out what just happend and what mode of the key of G that is. Those three modes will make you a pretty versatile rock or blues player. Then taking what you learned move to other keys and modes. While using the scales pay attention to the big three intervals, the I, III and V. Those are the magic tones that always work.

Then, when you think you know what you're doing, put on Mozart and be totally humbled.

I could probably write a book so we're only scratching the surface here and others have already written better books than I could anyway so let's stop here. This is an amp thread, not a theory thread.
 
Last edited:

Offshore Angler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
922
Oh yeah, some songs really aren't in any key. Great songs. Brian Wilson's God Only Knows comes to mind.
 
Last edited:

jb_abides

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
10,052
Regarding cabs, I’ve stopped using 4x12s mainly due to portability. I accept the directionality as an acceptable trade off for the closed back sound that I prefer. My next cab is going to be a diagonal, angled 2x12 both for ease of transport and a better sound spread.

Like the Mesa/Boogie Vertical/Slant Rectifier? Or something custom-ordered like Stagecraft or MojoTone? Or full-on custom from somewhere in your neck of the woods...?
 

Bob Womack

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 8, 2002
Messages
2,416
You know, life is a trade-off. Some of my favorite live tones were generated by wound out BIG amps - the Allamn Brothers, Wishbone Ash (Orange Graphic), etc. I worked up to 50 watters as my go-to.

But humans go through physical and mental seasons. One day you realize your ears can't do this forever. Somewhere around the age of sixty, many of us discover that we can't, and never again will be able to, do grab and go with seventy pound amps, cabs, and road cases. No, a smaller amp won't do what a larger one will. But a larger one can't do what a smaller one can.I'v still got a couple of fifty watt amps, but at sixty-nine years old, I am NOT going to cart around a Marshall 1987 and cab. But at thirty pounds, a Marshall Origin 20c is enough and is bright enough to rip 'yer head off. Honestly, I cart even it on a hand truck. No more arm-stretching exercises before gigs for me, thank you very much.

Bob
 

Athos

Active member
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Messages
176
Like the Mesa/Boogie Vertical/Slant Rectifier? Or something custom-ordered like Stagecraft or MojoTone? Or full-on custom from somewhere in your neck of the woods...?
Exactly! Well, not the M/B, but both Stagecraft and Mojotone have diagonal angled 2x12s that are the same width as a 1987x head. Perfect. The downside is shipping across the Atlantic; pricy even for an unloaded cab (I already have a pair of Scumback M75 65W speakers on the way for whatever I end up getting). TAD in Germany sometimes has the Stagecraft in stock, but not at the moment. I’ll probably wait until they have another Stagecraft in stock and order that.

The M/B cab is way heavier than I want, and too narrow at the top. I’ve asked around about local cab builders, but the advice I got from people in the guitar world locally is that the quality will be hit and miss, and would likely cost as much as a stock cab from a major brand anyway.
 

Jethro Rocker

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2022
Messages
570
Exactly! Well, not the M/B, but both Stagecraft and Mojotone have diagonal angled 2x12s that are the same width as a 1987x head. Perfect. The downside is shipping across the Atlantic; pricy even for an unloaded cab (I already have a pair of Scumback M75 65W speakers on the way for whatever I end up getting). TAD in Germany sometimes has the Stagecraft in stock, but not at the moment. I’ll probably wait until they have another Stagecraft in stock and order that.

The M/B cab is way heavier than I want, and too narrow at the top. I’ve asked around about local cab builders, but the advice I got from people in the guitar world locally is that the quality will be hit and miss, and would likely cost as much as a stock cab from a major brand anyway.
I have a very old Traynor 2x12 that is the slant top half of a 4x12. At times not enough angle to hear it properly (no ears at eh back of my knees) So I got a Mojo one made. Super cool. Also a Marshall SC vertical 2x12 for stages with less width. A variety of smaller boxes fit on it including the Mesa Triple Crown 100 and EVH 5153 Stealth. I have also stacked the Mk V 35 on top of a closed back 1x12.
The Traynor is big enough to stack a 2x12 combo atop as well.

dkcUPSo.jpg


2mjBcnX.jpg


TqHl6Fd.jpg


8WzuULB.jpg


K7zvBpR.jpg
 

Mr. Papa

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
1,472
We’ve discussed the 20w Marshalls versus their full size versions to a great extent on the Marshall forum. The 20 watters do lack some headroom and thump according to those who own both. And many people still feel the need to attenuate them, they’re not that much quieter. Personally I don’t see the appeal, unless you want to save a small amount of weight and expense. Lots of love for them though, it’s nice to have options.
I have an SV20 and a DGT15 and I get a lot of enjoyment from them, but they definitely don’t push air like a 50 watt amp through a 2x12” or 4x12” cab, which I miss. I wish I could get the chest punch of a 100 watt from a 15 watt amp, but so does everybody. I’m starting to mess around with lower efficiency speakers to reduce the volume to hit the amp’s sweet spot, but that’s probably not a perfect solution because the relationship between sound amplitude and actual loudness is complex.

I have a Swart STR Tremelo that’s fun as hell in my studio, but I wouldn’t take it to a show with a band for all the reasons mentioned. It has a larger cabinet that opens it up a bit vs. a Champ or GA-5 sized thing. It’s a good reminder that cabinet design is like drum design, and speaker cabinets are big drums in a way just like acoustic guitars are like a drum. Resonance, size, construction, dimensions, and wood matter, not only just the speaker size or design.
 
Last edited:

Subliminal lanimilbuS

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2023
Messages
793
That's a great question but really hard to answer. Why? Well, modal playing on guitar is really about patterns and shifting them, and some scales don't fall into modes. All modes only use seven notes but there are 12 notes to work with so modes can result in some really boring, repetitive and forgettable music.

It's also not usually how a trained pro approaches the task at hand.

First, do they have charts and are they expecting you to play "to the ink"? If that's the case knowing scales and modes is great and all that, but reading and dexterity is required over theory.

Or on the other hand are they providing you with some framework for a song and wanting you to flesh it out? If it's original that's the money shot because you can sometimes get writing credit and that's were the real money is for a musician.

So for funk - funk has in general no guitar hero solos. Rarely am I playing more than a triad. Funk is about one thing: impeccable timing within highly syncopated beats. Yes, since flat sevens are ubiquitous in funk you may want to think modally as mixolydian (as often heard in TOP for example), or scale-wise maybe the blues scale, but mostly one stays in the chord tones so you really don't need to think in terms of scales. The other thing with funk is that there usually aren't a lot of changes going on (Buddy Miles excluded!) and your job as the guitar player is to propel things forward. Since the funk songs commonly don't feature cadences for resolution it's more about the syncopation and rhythm, again using triads or dyads to propel, but always finding the correct timing to keep forward motion in the groove. Funk grooves are amongst the tightest you ever be asked to play and even the tiniest timing error that wouldn't be noticed in other music will stick out like a sore thumb in funk. In short, funk is no place for undisciplined players who don't practice without a metronome or click.

Look at it this way: Jimmie Hendrix was a pretty innovative soloist (!) but nobody ever remembers a solo he did when he was in James Brown's band.

Disco. Wow, what to say here. For all it's malignment amongst a certain bunch of leather-clad hipsters, it can be some of the most sophisticated and demanding music you'll approach. Common minor to major transitions, use of sub-dominate substitutions to a B section, II,V,I's sneaking in here and there. You gotta be on your toes. And - with all this going on - it's melodic. Earth, Wind and Fire, AWB, Chicago, Bee Gees, Stevie Wonder all just major, major songwriting. But also a bit easier since they 're iconic songs as the guitar player I'm expected to reproduce the hit live. So again, I'm not having to put a lot of thought into choosing notes - Just remembering them :).
Where Disco will separate the wheat from the chaff with players is when they ask you to ride it on a stretch.

How do I approach my note selection for improvising? Rarely, if ever, do I start thinking in terms of a scale or mode. That would be akin to someone asking me build an engine and me starting by selecting what single wrench I'm going to use. Not very practical. I'm going to start with displacement, compression ratio, boost, head and valves, wet or dry sump, etc. Once all that's sketched out then I decide what tools to use.

Approaching a solo is much the same. First what key is it in? What chords are used, and what cadences are employed to build tension and resolve? These are the keys to improvising. Then it's the overall rhythmic feel and importantly, the dynamics. I'm going to work in the chord tones first because they're the roadmaps. Larry Carlton is a MASTER of this and I've tried to lean into his playing often. Using the chord tones I next want to build interest so I start looking to inversions. Even simple first inversion can add spice in a melody.

Now, am I only using the chord tones? Of course not. The other notes come into one of two categories (melodically speaking here- we all use ghosts and mutes for syncopation), either I choose it for a melodic tone or passing tone. Think about it, I have the I, III,V, & VII already mapped out in the chord tones. What's missing? The two, the four and the sixth. Easy peasy. With good ear training you hear the note you want and identify the interval as either a half or full tone and play accordingly. If you miss, just make a chromatic move IN TIME WITH THE MUSIC. Nobody will notice except your professor.

Now, if I'm still in the solo and it's starting to sound a bit tired I start looking for substitutions. For example you can almost always substitute a ii for IV to add spice. Hey, F and Dm are pretty darned close, aren't they?! But the audience wasn't expecting that and it's still results in a pleasantly resolving cadence. This can be effective in funk because you often create motifs (repeating patterns) and when one starts to get stale a sub may be perfect. In disco, being so melodic, not so much.

If you want to add a jazz feel play around with the 6th ala Robben Ford.

But notice here, I'm never once addressing scale or mode. And, its musical, not technical.

Playing scales sounds like - scales. Forcing modes can result in really bad note choices and boring linear lines that don't pull in the listener.

Do I ever get lost? Of course, all the time but that's when I'll go modal until I find my way, and when I do, I almost always will use the same Ionian scale patterns to find my way. I just shift the pattern to the closest place on the neck I need to be to have that set of intervals line up with the mode I want. Example, I'm over a Cm and I feel a brain fart coming on, I simply switch to an Eb Ionian scale until I feel a new direction.

It might sound complicated but trust me, after you do this stuff enough you'll see it all laid out on the fretboard as clear as day and wonder what all the fuss was about. You can do it, you just need to get the theory under your belt to see it.

So back to disco and why it can be really, really challenging for a player. First off, it's a pretty widely defined genre. From Donna Summers, to The Rolling Stones, to Kool and the Gang. Kool and the Gang is a great example because they really are a blend of funk and disco, so you may end up with all the challenges of a one-chord vamp with a melody all over a funk groove. Think about that. Not for the faint of heart. Or Tower of Power, or Buddy Miles, or Rufus. You have got to be dead-effing-balls on the funk all while improvising. But when it's happening, it will make the hair on the back of your neck stand up. Instead of a bunch of drunkards in Tee shirts and ripped jeans making devil horns and screaming, you get everyone from toddlers to great-grandmothers up and grooving. They can't help themselves.

And remember always with funk or disco - timing is everything. Lot's a stabs on say the second sixteenth of the fourth beat kind of stuff. You can't be sleeping or just "feelin' it".

Metal, meh, I'm too old to be angry and rebellious all the time. And it doesn't pay.

So where I rarely stick to a modal/scales approach, if you want to start down this road I would say start by leaning a couple different Ionian scale patterns key of C. Next play the C Ionian scale over an Am chord and listen to what just happened and then figure out what mode of the Key of A that is. Next, play the C Ionian scale over a G7 chord and figure out what just happend and what mode of the key of G that is. Those three modes will make you a pretty versatile rock or blues player. Then taking what you learned move to other keys and modes. While using the scales pay attention to the big three intervals, the I, III and V. Those are the magic tones that always work.

Then, when you think you know what you're doing, put on Mozart and be totally humbled.

I could probably write a book so we're only scratching the surface here and others have already written better books than I could anyway so let's stop here. This is an amp thread, not a theory thread.

I am curious then why you said the Hungarian minor, which is a scale specifically the fourth mode of the double harmonic major scale, is boring then. I wouldn't have responded otherwise.
 
Last edited:

Subliminal lanimilbuS

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2023
Messages
793
I thought I would also mention that modes were around for a thousand years before scales were invented. They were used to define the character or feeling of a melody long before harmony or key signatures were established. After scales began we started to use the term mode to describe what note of the Major scale they began on. They are the main basis for the feeling we create with music apart from notes outside their realm.
 

Offshore Angler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
922
Wrong. Modes do not define where the scale starts. They alter the intervals within the scale. Very simple to demonstrate. The C Ionian scale only uses the white keys. Other modes will use the black keys. For example in the C mixolydian mode you replace the b with b flat.
 
Last edited:

Athos

Active member
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Messages
176
Sure, you can define a mode by where it starts in relation to the Major (Ionian) scale. Dorian starts on D of the C Major scale, Lydian starts on F, et cetera.
 

Offshore Angler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
922
Sure, you can define a mode by where it starts in relation to the Major (Ionian) scale. Dorian starts on D of the C Major scale, Lydian starts on F, et cetera.

Not sure I agree.

You have to remember that the root note of the scale defines the context and the mode defines the intervals. If I'm in the key of C and only use the white keys I'm using the Ionian mode, regardless of what note I start the phrase on. Agree?

C Dorian, for example, "replaces" the E with Eb and the B with Bb. So we now have a scale that's 1, 2, b3, 4, 5, 6, b7 in the key of C major , or - depending on how you use it - it's a C minor scale with a raised 6th, would you again agree? So it's not the same notes just played in a different order.

If I play only the white keys in the key of C regardless of the order I play them I'm in C Ionian. But - in the key of D the notes of the C Ionian scale comprise a D minor scale with a raised 6th, aka D Dorian. And that my fellow guitar slingers - is the POWER of MODES and why they can be used as a basis for "feel", and by knowing the Ionian scales patterns for every root note you simply play the corresponding major scale that creates the mode you want in the key you're in ( or chord you're over, but be wary that mixing modes over changes can, while yielding extraordinary melodies (see Garcia, Jerry et. al.), you can make clam chowder if you miss a change or the bass player plays the wrong note! You may be off a tritone and then the earth will crack open and demons will escape to wreak havoc across the earth.)

in other words if I play only the white keys in the key of D I'm in D Dorian regardless of what order I play them in, agree? And E Dorian has two sharps, F# and C#, G Dorian would have one flat, Bb, etc.

I think we'll all agree modes are meaningless without context.

Unfortunately, there is a confusion that's been created by internet folks that merely changing the starting note changes the mode and this is patently untrue. If you change the starting note the distances between the others notes don't move unless you change the underlying structure of the passage.

A mode is a set of intervals, it defines which notes are a full step away from the proceeding note and which notes are half steps.

So back to the C Dorian example, b3 and b7 in the key of C. Anyone want to hazard a guess what chord that would sound really good over?

So for example, the F Dorian might be something if reach for if I make a IV to ii substitution in the key of E, would you not agree? And I'd do it before the chord change to set it up for a resolve.

You can do this stuff, It's not that complicated in reality, but as in all things music, there are usually different ways to describe it. Don't get me started on the whole 3/4 vs 6/8 thing. I've seen conservatory trained musicians get into food fights over it.

With modes it's just going to "click" for you one day. Don't look at modes as scales, approach them as altered intervals and they're easy.


Chuck
 
Last edited:

darkwave

Active member
Joined
Sep 17, 2001
Messages
413
I'm not particularly technical, so I wasn't planning to chime in on this thread as it developed (but I *did* use a 12w 1x10 at a gig recently and had no problems with volume even with a full drum kit playing rock), but...

I was taking dancing lessons with my wife and we learned the Viennese Waltz (6/8). Every song my wife suggested we use was 3/4 and I could not get her to understand that 6/8was counted in "2" and 3/4was counted in "3". I figured talking with the dance instructor would clear it all up.

That's when I learned that dance instructors count things in a VERY different way than musicians and she was no help at all!

- Douglas C.

You can do this stuff, It's not that complicated in reality, but as in all things music, there are usually different ways to describe it. Don't get me started on the whole 3/4 vs 6/8 thing. I've seen conservatory trained musicians get into food fights over it.
 

Athos

Active member
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Messages
176
@darkwave, I think it took me learning Irish tunes on the violin to really "get" the difference between 3/4 and 6/8 time. Learning a slip jig (9/8 time) probably helped clear it up more.

And sure, Chuck, whatever you say about modes. Always more than one way to understand music theory.
 

Offshore Angler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
922
I'm not particularly technical, so I wasn't planning to chime in on this thread as it developed (but I *did* use a 12w 1x10 at a gig recently and had no problems with volume even with a full drum kit playing rock), but...

I was taking dancing lessons with my wife and we learned the Viennese Waltz (6/8). Every song my wife suggested we use was 3/4 and I could not get her to understand that 6/8was counted in "2" and 3/4was counted in "3". I figured talking with the dance instructor would clear it all up.

That's when I learned that dance instructors count things in a VERY different way than musicians and she was no help at all!

- Douglas C.

It IS in six, but you can think of it as two triplets. But there are 6 eighth notes per measure. You can't count it in two because there would be 3 quarter notes instead of 2 triplets. Using an eight to define the beat is what throws most folks off. That's difference between READING music vs. listening to music :).
 

Athos

Active member
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Messages
176
"you can think of it as two triplets"
"You can't count it in two"

Well, which is it?
 

Any Name You Wish

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Messages
839
Hey you guys, this thread is about ranting about crappy small amps! This thread is about crummy guitarists that are cheap and buy cheap gear, and then bang the sh*t out of their cheap guitar through their cheap little amp and drive people away running. Now, let's get back to it.
 

Offshore Angler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
922
"you can think of it as two triplets"
"You can't count it in two"

Well, which is it?

Thought I described it but above in terms of the time signature, but for those that can't read music:

A triplet is a single beat divided into thirds. It will be notated as three "beamed" eight notes BUT there will be a numeral "3" over the beam to designate it as a triplet and not 3 eight notes beamed. If you look at a 6/8 Walz, you commonly see the beamed eight notes are in threes so there will be two beamed eight note triples. Not the same. A triplet is one beat, but in 6/8 each of the eighth notes is a beat, so you would count the first beam one two three, and the second beam 4,5,6. To a listener however, they may interpret it as 123, 223, or just 123,123,123, which is fine, but what you hear and what the musician sees telling him or her where to place the notes is different.

In the case of a waltz, there is usually little to no syncopation involved off the straight beats (this is historical in origin to the Romantic period of music and based upon a German style from Vienna in case you ever wanted to know ) such that how the listener counts doesn't matter too much. It was the 18th century version of, "Dick, it's got a good beat and it's easy to dance to and so I give it a six". So the waltz can be counted in three or even two as long as the king's courtly gentlemen and ladies were happy.

But now, let's move 6/8 forward 200 years and see what the Allman Brothers did with it. Lot's of syncopation and swampy groove. You ain't scoring Whipping Post or In Memory of Elizabeth Reed in two. No way, no how. And it matters to pro musicians because it's the sheet music that gets copywritten.

This stuff may be foreign if you haven't had structured education, but you can learn it. We teach this stuff to fourth graders. You just need to push the tabs - that are rarely correct - away and decide to learn to read, learn theory and ear training. You CAN do it, I promise.

Chuck
 

Athos

Active member
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Messages
176
Hey you guys, this thread is about ranting about crappy small amps! This thread is about crummy guitarists that are cheap and buy cheap gear, and then bang the sh*t out of their cheap guitar through their cheap little amp and drive people away running. Now, let's get back to it.
You're right, sorry. Got sidetracked.

I did actually hear a metal band one time who were able to put on a convincing show despite their guitarist having only a cheap, small solid state practice amp available at the time. However, they had a lot working in their favour: the venue had a top-notch sound system, the venue owner (who was also the sound guy) really knew his business, played guitar himself, and cared about making everything sound great (excellent mic'ing and mixing knowledge), and of course, the guys could play.

That was an outlier, and kind of the exception that proves the rule. Generally speaking, for that kind of music, you want a big amp unless you go the digital route.
 
Top