• Guys, we've spent considerable money converting the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and we have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

Recent content by AJCR

  1. A

    '89 Les Paul Custom with mixed pickups?

    Arrogance much. The world has moved beyond you on this. We don't need your definition anymore. It is irrelevant.......
  2. A

    '89 Les Paul Custom with mixed pickups?

    So are you trying to say that Gibson (who were notoriously tighfisted at the time) cheapened out on the wire, but somehow at the same time developed 2 completely different pickups that were wound on the same bobbins with the same wire? Because you can see the new coils in early 1980 paired with...
  3. A

    Les Paul Custom: 79 or 86?

    There are those who dislike Norlins who would say neither. Those who own this era guitars and can see past the myths and misinformation would have no hesitation in recommending one or either. As an interesting note, the much vaunted Hj era from mid/late 86 onward changed absolutely nothing...
  4. A

    Les Paul Custom: 79 or 86?

    Ok, features are pretty different: 79: solid body with 3 piece maple neck, volute, 14degree headstock angle, more oversized headstock shape, possibly short body and the different cutaway shape. Pickups if original are Ttops. 86: weight relieved body with 1pc mahogany neck, 17deg headstock...
  5. A

    Why are Norlin era SG are horrible ??

    I think this sums up the thinking on this particular forum. People here just cannot seem to be able to see something for what it is. They are only capable of seeing something for what it isn't.
Top