JPP-1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 1,336
At the risk of bursting everyone's bubble, I asked Edwin this SPECIFIC question when Tom and I were down there this week. He said while they had a very small supply of "Honduras" mahogany in 2007, the vast majority of it was Figi mahogany, the exact same stuff they are using today.
So, unless you were one of the very lucky few who got Honduras(and you'll never know because there was no record kept), what is on your 2007 is exactly what is on the guitars they are making today.:jim
People with this "Honduran" mahogany fetish are really funny. I betcha the biggest proclaimers of how good their "honduran" mahogany 07 Historic sounds probably have a Les Paul made out of that "crappy" fiji mahogany. Despite the fact that its the exact same species as the honduran mahogany which isn't all grown in Honduras to begin with. Maybe I should see if the maple syrup from a maple tree in Canada tastes different from a maple tree in vermont. Lmfao. I'm glad to here the Fiji mahogany hasn't dampned Mr. Wittrock's enjoyment of his true historic CCs.
Btw, while I could be mistaken, I think 2007 is the only year Gibson even mentioned "Honduran" mahogany so I would love to know your source with regards to 2003 Historics and Honduran mahogany. Unless your talking about Honduran mahogany grown somewhere else like Fiji.
I do agree that the quality of rosewood fingerboards at least form a visual view point appear to have declined some.
Bottom line, with the possible exception of the 2003 braz board historics, (though many of those "real deal" braz fretboards look like stump wood ) the closest you are coming to a burst from Gibson are the true historics and the CCs with true historic specs.
I've owned a bunch of historics over the years and feel tonally, the 2013 and later historics get me closest to what I am looking for in a Les Paul. YMMV. So far my True Historic may be the best guitar I have played. But it is one guitar. I certainly haven't played sufficient quantities of every historic year to make any sort of accurate assessment that one year is better than another but then again, I'm not sure anyone has. Besides we are talking about guitars not wine.
In my humble opinion you get the closest with a 2003 Braz board Historic or with a 2007 Madagascar board Historic. The '03 will have Honduras mahogany from South America with the real-deal BRW, while the '07 will have the real-deal Honduran mahogany with MRW (which can be almost identical to Braz).
Don't get fooled with the marketing name "True Historic". I would only recommend one instead of the above examples, if you are really anal about small period-correct details, glue and plastic materials. THs are incredible instruments but only the maple top is made from the same wood as the originals - you should be aware of this fact if you share an orthodox view about the importance of authentic wood materials.
If a small run of True Historics made of Honduran mahogany and Madagascar RW (don't need to be BRW) would exist, that would be the absolute king of post-'50s Les Pauls in my opinion. The milestone of post-2013 changes combined with the incredible '07 wood materials, imagine that! No one would have a problem with the True Historic hyperbol if Gibson would release such a beast of an instrument (and a lot less would turn to Replicas). A contemporary Les Paul with such features could finally compete with the originals in every way and it would be the birth of a new legend for the future generations.
Last edited: