MarcB
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2023
- Messages
- 989
If only it was in ca. the same condition as when EC used it, it could easily fetch 1M I think.It’s a pretty iconic guitar.. but will someone pay £1m .. it’ll be interesting if it does sell for that amount..
I have been harping about the same thing for years! Personally, I think it could be easily reverted to Cream-era condition by any number of the amazing guitar resto experts out there. Remove the stop tailpiece and Schaller bridge, touch up the paint as necessary, install early 60's ABR-1, install Vibrola (minus the cover plate), swap the knobs, paint the neck plate yellow, and (IMHO) replace the Grovers with dual-ring Klusons. Anything else?.... If only it was in ca. the same condition as when EC used it, it could easily fetch 1M I think.....
But to try & make it "back to specs" would be in the same category as having Gruhn's top luthiers to conceil Greeny's headstock break as if it never happened
My example with Greeny was just to show, that to change something just to make a famous guitar look like it once did, would be to try to rewrite history. My original point was that IF Clapton's SG had been in the same condition as when he had it, I think it would fetch far more than it will now. But we'll see when auction is over.Respectfully, I don't see any correlation. The SG, like Greenie, HAS already had it's headstock and neck repaired, and neck back paint was brought back to original condition, so why not change knobs & bridge? Minor appointments - replacement not repairs.
When Gibson replicated Greenie they did not include a faux neck repair - they made it appear as it did when Peter played it. I am only talking about Cream "appearance" specifications. Just my opinion.
Keyword here is was.It was quite a guitar.