• Guys, we've spent considerable money converting the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and we have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

Mapleflame Mod on my Pre-Historic

Brad737

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Messages
99
Hello all,

I recently came across the Mapleflame Mod threads and I'm interested in giving it a shot. However, I also ran across a post where a gent with a Pre-Historic Les Paul noticed his wiring channel ran right under the bridge's treble post.

I have a 1989 "Pre-Historic" 59 Flametop Reissue. I can't tell for sure if the wiring channel passes directly under my treble post. I'm away from home at the moment, and just looked at a photo I knew I had of the pickup cavity. It may turn out that there's mahogany under my post. I just don't know.

734637EA-6F6B-4A96-B345-ED8CAF00D6EF-419-0000001D6BFF6782.jpg


I haven't measured to see how deep the holes were drilled, but my plan is to screw the SS posts in all the way, down into the mahogany if possible. But first, I have a few questions. First off, would it be worthwhile to replace just the bass side with a longer SS screw? Is there a benefit to bottoming out the screw, or is it the increased about of thread contact that improves the tone? Should I try a SS at stock length on the treble side? Would it be a bad idea to tap the treble side hole a little deeper? If so, how much wood should I leave at the bottom of that hole, an eighth-inch, a quarter-inch, etc?

If I did increase the depth of the treble hole, and it was in fact over the wiring channel, would it really be a problem if the post came out the bottom? I'm just wondering if the increased thread area would offset the lack of a bottom tonewise?

What do you all think?

Thanks,
Brad
 
Top