Hopefully this isn't too dumb a question from a complete LP newby.
I am primarily a banjo player (ouch) but have played acoustic guitar for a long time. I have also collected instruments for many years and my only electric guitar is a 1964 Fender Telecaster, all original, in pristine condition. I mention this, as I have owned it over 30 years, and since I really do not play electric it has literally sat in the case all this time. I really do not need to be sitting on a guitar this expensive that I do not play. Before long I plan on selling the guitar (have a friend that is interested in buying) and I thought it would be fun to buy a Les Paul that I would play regularly and really learn to play an electric like it should be played. I was at the Asheville Guitar show this weekend and saw many nice (to me anyway) sunburst Les Pauls, most with the curly Maple tops ..... ranging mostly from about $1500 to $5000. I did not pay attention to all of the features that made one more expensive than the other but assume it was date of manufacture or "standard", "custom",, "studio", etc. or whatever designation to define the features. So my question is ...... is there a rule of thumb on what year or era that one Les Paul is better than the other or any year or era to avoid. Is there a step, for instance above say the $1500 guitars (guessing they were all the same model and close to same year) that is significant enough to justify the extra money? Thanks in advance for any advice!
I am primarily a banjo player (ouch) but have played acoustic guitar for a long time. I have also collected instruments for many years and my only electric guitar is a 1964 Fender Telecaster, all original, in pristine condition. I mention this, as I have owned it over 30 years, and since I really do not play electric it has literally sat in the case all this time. I really do not need to be sitting on a guitar this expensive that I do not play. Before long I plan on selling the guitar (have a friend that is interested in buying) and I thought it would be fun to buy a Les Paul that I would play regularly and really learn to play an electric like it should be played. I was at the Asheville Guitar show this weekend and saw many nice (to me anyway) sunburst Les Pauls, most with the curly Maple tops ..... ranging mostly from about $1500 to $5000. I did not pay attention to all of the features that made one more expensive than the other but assume it was date of manufacture or "standard", "custom",, "studio", etc. or whatever designation to define the features. So my question is ...... is there a rule of thumb on what year or era that one Les Paul is better than the other or any year or era to avoid. Is there a step, for instance above say the $1500 guitars (guessing they were all the same model and close to same year) that is significant enough to justify the extra money? Thanks in advance for any advice!