• THIS IS THE 25th ANNIVERSARY YEAR FOR THE LES PAUL FORUM! PLEASE CELEBRATE WITH US AND SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO KEEP US GOING! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and recently moved to a new hosting platform. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!
  • WE HAVE MOVED THE LES PAUL FORUM TO A NEW HOSTING PROVIDER! Let us know how it is going! Many thanks, Mike Slubowski, Admin
  • Please support our Les Paul Forum Sponsors with your business - Gary's Classic Guitars, Wildwood Guitars, Chicago Music Exchange, Reverb.com, Throbak.com and True Vintage Guitar. From personal experience doing business with all of them, they are first class organizations. Thank you!

Maple Caps vs. Solid Mahogany: Tonal Differences?

jb_abides

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
6,433
A thousand pardons, I meant Special.

No worries!

The question was really focused on how a carved top maple cap over a mahogany back sounds versus a solid carved top as found on the 50s Customs. So was expecting a Custom somewhere in the video... Cool P-90s though.
 

ZigM

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
3
I know the original intent of the maple cap was to brighten the tone a bit, from the darker sounding Mahogany. Many agree this does occur. Some differ, I think Big Al represents those who feel there is little or no real difference (chime in Big Al if I've mis-stated your position). I'm curious what others have to say. I guess the test guitars would be 50's GoldTops vs. Customs (or the modern versions).
I worked in the music industry for 25 years, including for a Gibson importer and in manufacturing. I sold a lot of Fender, Ibanez but less Gibsons (must have been the high price). I'd be wealthy if I got a dollar for every time that my boss told an unwitting customer that the Les Paul's Honduran body with maple cap means glorious balanced sound. I usually own three of the same guitars. The three Fender Stratocasters that I currently own all sound different. The overall sound is still Fender-ish but there are unique and minor differences in certain frequencies and how they fade, including overall brightness. My Ibanez RG550's sounded extremely different with the lightest guitar sounding Fender-ish (with a lot of treble) while the other guitar, which was really heavy, sounded fat, meaty and with enhanced mid-range - more like a Les Paul. Neither Fender nor Ibanez guitars mixed different woods for their guitar bodies. Fender uses alder and Ibanez used basswood. So, while a thin, carved piece of maple might alter the sound a very, very tiny bit, overall it does not. I am looking at three Les Pauls right now. All three have solid African mahogany bodies with poplar caps. They have the same hardware but sound completely different. The lightest one has a chambered body and it vaguely responds like a 335. The next lightest one (3.25 kg) is bright and toppy. The heaviest guitar (4.25 kg) has a chunky, honky, Les Paul-ish sound. So, in my experience, the weight and density of the wood PLUS the pickups, hardware and the strings, make the sound of the guitar. The maple cap itself is almost inconsequential.
 
Top