• Guys, we've spent considerable money converting the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and we have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

EC+335 into a killer sounding amp

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
Oh man, you can't possibly be lumping Miles Davis in with Wynton. Can you?
No, and I am a bit horrified by the idea that my comments could be interpeted as somehow having done that. To clarify, I meant that people like Fats Navarro or Miles (or whoever) are the innovators in jazz — not Wynton, or his whole crowd.
.
.
 

markwayne

New member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
22
No, and I am a bit horrified by the idea that my comments could be interpeted as somehow having done that. To clarify, I meant that people like Fats Navarro or Miles (or whoever) are the innovators in jazz — not Wynton, or his whole crowd.
.
.

Ah, thanks for the clarification. As someone who worships Miles, I just saw "not Wynton or Miles" and did not notice the period between them.
 

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
Ah, thanks for the clarification. As someone who worships Miles, I just saw "not Wynton or Miles" and did not notice the period between them.
Some of the best and truest (and most hilarious) words ever spoken about Wynton actually came from the Prince of Darkness himself. Whenever I think of these quotes, I have to laugh at how dead-on they are:
.
.
......."They got Wynton playing some old, dead European music. If he keeps on, they're going to fuck him up."
.
.
And then there was Miles's (to me, classic) recollection of Wynton coming up on stage unannounced in 1986, in the middle of Miles's band playing their set:
.
.
......."All of a sudden I feel this presence coming up on me, this body movement, and I see that the crowd is kind of
........wanting to cheer or gasp. Then Wynton whispers in my ear — and I'm still trying to play — 'They told me to come
........up here.' I said, 'Man, what the fuck are you doing up here on stage? Get the fuck off the stage!'"
.
.
.
 

bern1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
1,281
I think Clapton might be the anti-Wynton. A man who has only focused on one small niche for a very long time and still, somehow, missed the mark slightly. I honestly sometimes have a hard time picking out Clapton's playing because he stays so safe that there aren't enough edges to make the form recognizable.

Missed the mark? He defined the rules of the match and set up the target. Does he play it safe sometimes? Sure, so does BB and most everybody else at times.

One thing about Clapton, when I hear a new record, I often don't like it at first, sometimes I think it "misses the mark." But after a few spins I get the drift of where he's going with it and it grows on me. I'm just happy he's still alive and playing!

As for Marsalis, yes he can be irksome, but he's a great ambassador for America's home grown art form. I think it's great those guys are playing with EC on this project, I really dig the record.
 

Elliot Easton

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,478
No, and I am a bit horrified by the idea that my comments could be interpeted as somehow having done that. To clarify, I meant that people like Fats Navarro or Miles (or whoever) are the innovators in jazz — not Wynton, or his whole crowd.
.
.

In that case let's not leave out Clifford Brown.
 

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
Yes, absolutely! In terms of trumpeters, I guess if I had to assemble a "short" list, I'd say Louis, Bix, Dizzy, Fats, Miles, Clifford, and Freddie Hubbard. I'm sure I've left important people out, but those are the 'main' guys that come to mind off the top of my head....
.
.
.
.
.
.
 

Elliot Easton

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,478
Bix! The greatest! I once asked Amos Garrett about his influences because of his unusual choices and unique style. He said he was trying to play like Bix. And Tram. For Trumpet I also love Lee Morgan's Blue Note stuff.
 

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
The overuse of the word "genius" is the one that really gets my goat! Don't get me started on that one! If you're not talking about the level of Einstein, Mozart or Gershwin then leave it out!
Hey, while we're on the subject of "short lists" in general (i.e., not just of trumpeters, but of geniuses, etc.), I forgot to mention this before — I couldn't help but be struck by the coincidence of your inclusion of George Gershwin in the above-quoted list from a couple of days ago. And I wholeheartedly agree with it, glad to see Gershwin in there! You see, this week I've been listening around the clock to a 1956 version of "A Foggy Day" that I haven't heard in years because I don't have a record player and I don't think I ever re-purchased this version on CD. Anyway, I am ordinarily not too big a fan of the whole West Coast sound, but I cannot get over three things on this record: (1) the cleverness and elegance of the arrangement (sounds almost like something Marty Paich could have arranged); (2) the great feel, taste, and swing of the playing and the solos; and (3) that these guys managed to cram all this great playing into LESS than four minutes. Also interesting about this record, since we're talking about trumpeters, is that this strikes me as a slightly less conventional quintet, because rather than a saxophonist and a trumpeter, the group for this tune has two saxophonists as the front line (not "really" unconventional, but I would expect the more familar trumpet/sax lineup on a record like this).

Anyway, I was bored last week and decided to see if someone possibly ever uploaded this to YouTube, and lo and behold one person did, thereby further cementing YouTube's status (IMO, at least) as the world's greatest jukebox [laughs]:
.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H5epjb1vbY
.
.
.
 

Elliot Easton

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,478
man, it's such a pleasure to see a discussion about something other than baked maple or whether jimmy page's #1 has a replaced poker chip. there are some very knowledgeable guys around here who obviously have some deep roots. i like it.
 

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
man, it's such a pleasure to see a discussion about something other than baked maple or whether jimmy page's #1 has a replaced poker chip. there are some very knowledgeable guys around here who obviously have some deep roots. i like it.
Well, to me this is full circle. What I mean is, and this is the truth, it was listening over and over again to three (or possibly four) albums between 1978 and 1981, that got me into music to begin with (playing music, I mean). And one of those records was Panorama. I was about 11 when I first heard it. I realize that the connection between that record and some of the music we're discussing in this thread may seem like a stretch, but your playing on that record got me actually transcribing solos off the record, which led to other players, which ultimately led to Miles, and then I stopped playing the guitar and got almost exclusively into being a pianist, and now (fast-forward a couple of more decades) I'm back to electric guitars. So yeah, this place is real cool!
.
 

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
Let me guess: "Touch and Go"?
Well, I definitely have always been impressed by the architecture and/or structure of that solo. One thing I liked about it (then and now) is the sense of build in it, it almost sounds like a composition unto itself within an already composed song. Definitely a real triumphant build in that solo, and a very happy-sounding solo in general.

But, no — not that one (although I listened to it many times). For me, I guess the things of yours on that record (as well as on Candy-O) that stood out, were parts of the arrangements, basically linear solo "fills" or actual parts (i.e., as opposed to solos) of yours. For example, the opening phrase to "Got a Lot on My Head" is an absolute classic. Almost baroque-sounding in at least one place. Also the arrangement and solo on "Down Boys," I was more or less obsessed with figuring out that song for months. Not just the guitar playing, I was really interested in the arrangement, even at that age. I might be wrong, but I hear an acoustic piano playing straight eighths mixed in real low, which I always thought was a great rock and roll sound but you don't hear it too much on a lot of records anymore. I loved that album because of how crisp-sounding it is, I mean in "Down Boys" just the sound of even the cymbals is so well defined. So, whenever I see Roy Thomas Baker's name on a record, I think of the work he did with you guys, before I think of any of his other work.

Anyway, I guess the solos of yours that I worked on the most were "Just What I Needed," "Down Boys," and "Got a Lot on My Head." I always wanted to learn the solo on "Touch and Go," but I was somewhat dividing my time between learning your parts and Greg's parts. I seem to also recall going to Sam Ash on East 13th Street in Brooklyn and trying to play "Dangerous Type" on a Prophet V (which, being eleven, I couldn't afford to shell out the requisite $3K for one) on a lot of weekends.

But, as anyone here would know, to go from being a listener, to suddenly realizing that you can play the record over and over again and actually learn how to play the parts yourself, is a revolutionary, life-changing concept in the hands of someone at that age. And when I think back on it, at least as far as the guitar is concerned, you were the first guy whose playing I really checked out. So, it's been kind of cool to see that you're on here. :dude:
.
 

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
....and while we're on this general time period/subject, I'm still dying to hear any stories about what it was like to have these guys as an opening act! :hee


Suicide-2.jpg

.
 

Elliot Easton

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,478
Well, I definitely have always been impressed by the architecture and/or structure of that solo. One thing I liked about it (then and now) is the sense of build in it, it almost sounds like a composition unto itself within an already composed song. Definitely a real triumphant build in that solo, and a very happy-sounding solo in general.

But, no — not that one (although I listened to it many times). For me, I guess the things of yours on that record (as well as on Candy-O) that stood out, were parts of the arrangements, basically linear solo "fills" or actual parts (i.e., as opposed to solos) of yours. For example, the opening phrase to "Got a Lot on My Head" is an absolute classic. Almost baroque-sounding in at least one place. Also the arrangement and solo on "Down Boys," I was more or less obsessed with figuring out that song for months. Not just the guitar playing, I was really interested in the arrangement, even at that age. I might be wrong, but I hear an acoustic piano playing straight eighths mixed in real low, which I always thought was a great rock and roll sound but you don't hear it too much on a lot of records anymore. I loved that album because of how crisp-sounding it is, I mean in "Down Boys" just the sound of even the cymbals is so well defined. So, whenever I see Roy Thomas Baker's name on a record, I think of the work he did with you guys, before I think of any of his other work.

Anyway, I guess the solos of yours that I worked on the most were "Just What I Needed," "Down Boys," and "Got a Lot on My Head." I always wanted to learn the solo on "Touch and Go," but I was somewhat dividing my time between learning your parts and Greg's parts. I seem to also recall going to Sam Ash on East 13th Street in Brooklyn and trying to play "Dangerous Type" on a Prophet V (which, being eleven, I couldn't afford to shell out the requisite $3K for one) on a lot of weekends.

But, as anyone here would know, to go from being a listener, to suddenly realizing that you can play the record over and over again and actually learn how to play the parts yourself, is a revolutionary, life-changing concept in the hands of someone at that age. And when I think back on it, at least as far as the guitar is concerned, you were the first guy whose playing I really checked out. So, it's been kind of cool to see that you're on here. :dude:
.


It's very gratifying to know that I was able to have that kind of impact on a young player. That's what it's all about, isn't it? Just passing it on. Your kind words are very much appreciated. Probably more than you know.
Peace,
EE
 

Elliot Easton

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,478
....and while we're on this general time period/subject, I'm still dying to hear any stories about what it was like to have these guys as an opening act! :hee


Suicide-2.jpg

.

Oy! I could write a book about that! Definitely living theater!:lol
 

lpnv59

All Access/Backstage Pass
Joined
Jul 15, 2001
Messages
10,725
....and while we're on this general time period/subject, I'm still dying to hear any stories about what it was like to have these guys as an opening act! :hee


Suicide-2.jpg

.
Oy! I could write a book about that! Definitely living theater!:lol


Marty & Alan opened for us at The Rat. Got to hang out with them in NY when we played CB's. Two of nicest people we ever shared a stage with. Their music drew out anger from the audience which I never got. I thought the music was a great blend of roots R&R and sci fi. But yeah, definitely living theater......Literally!!!! Alan wouldn't book a room at a hotel the weekend we did the Rat gig. They would buy a ticket at the cinema and sleep thru the films.


And so I'm not hijacking. I'm so sick of Layla, in any shape or form, I just couldn't get thru the Clapton/Marsalis vid.
 

peeninety

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2002
Messages
297
Not sure how this example would fit in here...sure it's a ES, but to me it just sounds crappy and fuzzy. If you would just listen to this without knowing who is playing (and a good portion of the discussion is about perception) you'd consider this as a "okay" playing through some cheap sounding equipment.

I don't at all disagree; I feel exactly that way about most of EC's playing since the Dominoes. My point was that there are other contexts in which I prefer EC and that, shitty buzzy tone notwithstanding, I would rather hear EC interpret a New Orleans tune with New Orleans musicians than to hear yet another treatment of an admitted classic that I have already heard too many times. I did, by the way, sample the other stuff from the Wynton et al. performance that has been posted to YouTube, and I was not terribly excited by any of it.

I do not mean to dis anyone here. I love EC, and owe him much. And though I find him too academic and uncool, Wynton is a great player. I also dig how he and the band treated Layla in this instance. But if I must listen to EC today, I prefer the clip I posted to the sort of thing that was posted as the departure point for this thread.
 
Last edited:

vintage58

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
3,958
It's very gratifying to know that I was able to have that kind of impact on a young player. That's what it's all about, isn't it? Just passing it on. Your kind words are very much appreciated. Probably more than you know.
Peace,
EE
:salude
.
Oy! I could write a book about that! Definitely living theater!:lol
:rofl
.
Marty & Alan opened for us at The Rat. Got to hang out with them in NY when we played CB's. Two of nicest people we ever shared a stage with. Their music drew out anger from the audience which I never got. I thought the music was a great blend of roots R&R and sci fi. But yeah, definitely living theater......Literally!!!! Alan wouldn't book a room at a hotel the weekend we did the Rat gig. They would buy a ticket at the cinema and sleep thru the films.
One thing that surprises me is that Alan is apparently 73 years old now, which would mean that he was about 42 in 1980. (Since the two of you actually interacted with him around that time, could this be true?) As I understand things, it was revealed a couple of years ago that he is actually ten years older than had been previously believed. I don't know how true this all is, but at present his birth year is reportedly 1938.

The below-linked YouTube clip is too hilarious. It is just audio, and there's not a dull moment in the whole four minutes (for example, the crowd's steady chant of the word "Elvis"), but things *really* get cooking toward the last minute or so, especially when Alan shouts, "SHUT THE FUCK UUUUUP!!! THIS IS ABOUT FRANKIE!!!":
.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdpU5roXBfE
.
.
.
 
Top